| |
FOUNDING CONCEPTS
Specific
Outcomes
By studying
the articles related to this question you will be able to:
- define liberalism
and parliamentary democracy as they apply to Canada's past and present
- understand
the importance of Lord Durham's Report in the shaping of identities
in Canada
- identify sources
of regional tensions throughout Canada's history
Setting
the Stage
Before reading
the articles look at the introduction to the Question:
- What does it
mean to "found" a country?
- How was Canada's
founding different from the U.S.?
- Based on what
you know, how would you answer the questions in the introduction
to this Great Canadian Question?
- Are your answers
confirmed or refuted by the readings?
Reading
for Understanding
Questions
for Barry Cooper's first article:
- According to
Cooper, what does it mean to "found" a country?
- How did Canada's
creation differ from that of the U.S.?
- What role did
Confederation play in Canada's development?
- Does Cooper
believe that Canada was established on the basis of some founding
principles? What evidence does he present to support his view?
- What "well-known"
ideas were important in Canada's political life at the time of Confederation,
according to Cooper?
- How have these
ideas shaped Canada's political life since then?
- Government
in the United States is said to be a system of "checks and balances"
among the executive, legislative and judicial branches. What kinds
of balances are there in our system, according to Cooper?
- How have the
development and timing of responsible government on the prairies
shaped the attitude of its people towards liberalism and popular
democracy?
- What is "populist
liberalism"?
- How are Quebec
and the West similar in their responses to Ottawa's version of Parliamentary
democracy and liberalism? How do their responses differ?
- "All Canadians,
and especially those in the unmovable centre of the country, Ontario,
should be grateful for the impurities supplied to the communitarian
realities of Quebec and the extra-parliamentary populism of the
west." Why?
Questions
for Bob Rae's first article:
- What was Canada
like when The Clash was written? Why do you think Rae began his
essay with reference to this work?
- What is the
Canadian paradox?
- What aspects
of this paradox do the speeches of Thurlow and Burke, the report
of Durham and the actions of Macdonald represent?
- "The modern
state can never be co-terminus with 'the nation' without a brutal
exercise in ethnic cleansing." What does Rae mean? How does he support
his view?
- Rae argues
that we have founding principles. What are they?
- According to
Rae, "McGee understood that Canada's diversity required a different
public philosophy from its colonial past." What was the previous
public philosophy?
- "Those who
argue that Canada is made up of ten provinces which must be treated
exactly the same a cookie-cutter approach to equality
are arguing in defiance of Canadian history." What evidence does
Rae offer to support this view?
- Quebec is entitled
to ask the rest of Canada, "What do you want"? What evidence does
Rae offer to support this assertion?
Questions
for Barry Cooper's second article:
- What principles
will guide Canada into the next century?
- Why does Cooper
praise Durham and his report?
- What comparisons
does Cooper make between les Patriotes of 1837 and the sovereigntists
in Quebec today?
- What is the
point of federalism in Canada today?
Questions
for Bob Rae's second article:
- How have the
following events in Canada's history influenced Canadian federalism?
Joseph Howe's views of Confederation / Louis Riel's rebellion /
The Conservative victory in the 1911 election / The preoccupation
by the Pearson government with English-French relations / Trudeau's
governments/ The Free Trade Agreement and the national government's
fiscal crisis?
- "Federalism"
is about balance." What does Rae mean here?
Critical
Comparison
- To what parts
of Rae's argument in the first essay does Cooper respond?
- To what parts
of Cooper's argument in the first essay does Rae respond?
- On what points
to they agree?
- On what points
do they disagree?
- To what extent
do you think that their backgrounds have influenced their views
on this subject?
- Where do you
stand and why on the issue of whether or not the idea of Canada
is based on a set of enduring principles or values? How do you justify
your view?
- What evidence
is especially important in your conclusions?
|