| |
CANADA AND THE WORLD
Specific
Outcomes
By studying
the articles related to this question you will be able to:
- identify
characteristics of Canadian foreign policy over the years
- describe
characteristics of the post Cold War world
- identify
future directions for Canada's role in the world
- identify
challenges to Canada's continued influence in world affairs
- identify
ways in which Canada can meet these challenges
Setting
the Stage
Before reading
the articles look at the introduction to the Question:
- What has
Canada's reputation been in the world over the years? Justify
your view.
- Based on
what you know, how would you answer the questions in the introduction
to this Great Canadian Question?
- Are your
answers confirmed or refuted by the readings?
Reading
for Understanding
Questions
for Allan Gotlieb's first article:
- How does
Gotlieb characterise Canadian foreign policy in the years before
World War I / between the wars / during and after World War II?
- How does
he characterise the world after the Cold War?
- What does
he mean by "an asymmetrical concentration of power", "Zeitgeist",
"a judicialised approach to state behaviour"?
- Why does
Canada need to reshape its foreign policy in the post Cold War
world?
- What should
be our future priorities in foreign affairs, according to Gotlieb?
How does he support his view?
- What assets
does Canada possess for its quest towards a new foreign policy?
- What challenges
do we face in making the most of our assets to influence world
affairs?
Questions
for Janice Stein's first article:
- According
to Stein, what is the current view about Canada's capacity to
influence the rest of the world? What are the sources of such
a view?
- According
to Stein, how can Canada make a difference in global issues?
- What is the
most serious threat to Canada's sovereignty? What evidence does
she offer to support her views?
- Why does
Stein think that a deep understanding of Canada's history is important
to developing Canada's capacity to influence the world?
- What power
does Canada have to speak strategically?
Questions
for Allan Gotlieb's second article:
- How does
Gotlieb describe Canada's relationship with the U.S.? What "threat"
is the U.S. to Canada? How does he support his view?
- In what ways
are Canadian and U.S. foreign policies "asymmetrical"?
- How should
we conduct our relations with the U.S. according to Gotlieb?
Questions
for Janice Stein's second article:
- What does
Stein mean when she argues that successful Canadian foreign policy
will depend on a "full orchestra of players"?
- "For better
or for worse, the twentieth century has been the golden age of
the state." What does Stein mean and what arguments are there
to support the "for better" and "for worse" claims?
- If the United
States is so powerful, what limits are there to its power?
- In addition
to politicians and diplomats, what other Canadians can have influence
in world affairs?
- In what ways
is Canada well positioned to lead in the New World of diplomacy?
Critical
Comparisons
- To what parts
of Stein's argument in the first essay does Gotlieb respond?
- To what parts
of Gotlieb's argument in the first essay does Stein respond?
- On what points
do they agree?
- On what points
do they disagree?
- Where do
you stand and why on the issue of Canada's future role in the
world?
- What evidence
is especially important in your conclusions?
|